
Meet Butlr
Discover what spatial intelligence can do for you.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
The modern workplace is hybrid, data-driven, and privacy-sensitive. In 2026, UK organisations choosing occupancy sensors must balance accurate people-sensing with strong data protection and employee trust. This guide explains camera-free, privacy-first sensor options, UK regulatory considerations, technical and procurement criteria, and an actionable checklist to help you choose and deploy workplace occupancy sensing responsibly.
What are occupancy sensors?
Occupancy sensors detect whether a space is occupied and, in many cases, count how many people are present.
- Lighting and HVAC automation to reduce energy use.
- Space utilisation analytics for real estate optimisation.
- Desk and room booking experiences that reflect real use.
Define terms
- Presence detection: sensing if at least one person is present.
- People counting: estimating the number of occupants in a space.
- Camera-free sensing: using non-visible-image technologies (e.g., thermal, radar) that do not produce photographic images.
Why choose camera-free, privacy-first sensors?
Camera-free sensors minimise the collection of identifiable personal data, reducing privacy risks and improving workplace acceptance.
- Stronger compliance posture under UK GDPR and the Data Protection Act 2018.
- Easier employee buy-in and fewer consent/signage complexities.
- Lower risk of misuse, leakage, or surveillance perceptions compared with cameras.
- Viable accuracy for most workplace use cases when paired with modern AI and edge processing.
Note: camera-free does not absolve you from data protection obligations. You still need lawful basis, transparency, and appropriate safeguards.
Common camera-free sensor technologies
Thermal (non-image thermal sensors)
Senses heat signatures rather than camera images; often processes data on-device.
- Pros: Good for presence and counting, privacy-preserving, robust in low light.
- Cons: Reduced granularity for detailed behaviour analytics compared with visual cameras.
Passive Infrared (PIR)
Detects motion via changes in infrared energy.
- Pros: Low cost, simple for presence detection.
- Cons: Not suitable for accurate counts or distinguishing multiple stationary occupants.
Microwave / Radar
Measures movement and distance using radio waves.
- Pros: Can penetrate some materials, works in dark.
- Cons: Can be affected by reflections; counts may be challenging in dense environments.
Ultrasonic
Uses sound waves to detect movement and occupancy.
- Pros: Works in confined areas.
- Cons: Sensitive to noise and layout; limited large-area coverage.
CO2 and Environmental Sensing
Indirect occupancy estimation based on CO2 concentration and air quality.
- Pros: Useful for ventilation control.
- Cons: Lagging indicator, poor for real-time counting.
Wi-based or Bluetooth tracking (device-based)
Tracks smartphones or badges by Wi-fingerprint or BLE.
- Pros: Can provide individual-level movement if consented.
- Cons: Raises privacy concerns; accuracy depends on device counts and policies.
Choose technology or combinations based on required accuracy, privacy needs, site layout, and integrations.