Wireless Occupancy Sensors

Meet Butlr

Discover what spatial intelligence can do for you.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

What is a wireless occupancy sensor?

A wireless occupancy sensor is a battery-powered or line-powered device that senses presence and sends occupancy data over a wireless network. Common sensor types include passive infrared (PIR), ultrasonic, camera-based, and thermal (heat-based). Wireless deployment removes cabling constraints and enables rapid installation and flexible reconfiguration.

Occupancy detection: recognizes that a space is occupied and can trigger lighting or HVAC changes.
Vacancy sensing: allows manual activation but automatically turns systems off after a vacancy period to save energy.
Wireless sensor network: sensors communicate via protocols like Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE), Wi-Fi, LoRa, or proprietary mesh to gateways or building systems.

How thermal (heat-based) sensors differ from PIR and camera systems

Thermal sensors detect infrared heat patterns rather than motion or visible images. They register the thermal signature of bodies, enabling presence detection even when occupants are sedentary.
PIR (passive infrared) sensors detect motion changes in the infrared spectrum and can miss low-motion scenarios such as people working quietly at desks.
Camera systems provide rich visual data but raise privacy concerns and require more bandwidth, storage, and maintenance.

Advantages of thermal over alternatives

Better accuracy for low-motion occupancy (desks, meetings).
Anonymous sensing: no images or personally identifiable data are captured, easing privacy compliance.
Lower false negatives in crowded or partially occupied spaces compared to motion-only sensors.

Key benefits — privacy, accuracy, energy savings, scalability

Privacy-first: heat-based sensors provide anonymous presence detection without cameras, reducing regulatory and employee concerns.
Higher accuracy in real-world use: thermal sensing maintains detection when occupants are still, improving lighting and HVAC control.
Energy savings: more reliable occupancy data means lights and HVAC run only when needed, cutting utility costs.
Scalable deployments: wireless mesh architectures enable hundreds to thousands of sensors with centralized analytics.
Low maintenance: long battery life and remote firmware updates lower ongoing operational costs.

Product features and quick specs (what to look for)

When evaluating wireless occupancy sensors, consider sensing technology, mounting, power, wireless protocol, integration, data outputs, privacy controls, and management options.

Sensing technology: thermal vs PIR vs camera.
Mounting options: ceiling, wall, desk, or integrated fixtures.
Power: battery type and expected battery life (multi-year preferred) or wired power options.
Wireless protocol: BLE, Wi-Fi, LoRaWAN, Zigbee, or proprietary mesh.
Integration: APIs, BACnet, Modbus, or direct BMS and lighting control compatibility.
Data outputs: real-time occupancy, aggregated counts, dwell times, and anonymized heat maps.
Privacy controls: anonymization defaults, no-image capture, and data retention policies.
Management: cloud or on-prem analytics, remote diagnostics, and firmware updates.

Quick feature callouts

Anonymous thermal sensing — camera-free.
Wireless and wired mounting options.
Real-time presence and aggregated analytics for space utilization.
Long battery life and wireless mesh networking for large sites.
Open APIs and BMS integration options for lighting and HVAC control.

Use cases — where wireless thermal sensors excel

Offices: detect desk-level presence for lighting/HVAC and flexible workspace analytics.
Conference rooms: reliable occupancy detection for accurate scheduling and energy control.
Retail: anonymous footfall and zone occupancy to optimize staffing and environment settings.
Education: classroom and lab usage monitoring without cameras.
Healthcare: room occupancy monitoring that respects patient privacy and reduces energy waste.

Installation & integration — practical steps

Site survey: map the zones to be monitored and choose optimal mounting heights. Ceiling mounts typically provide the broadest coverage.
Choose wireless topology: small deployments may use Bluetooth mesh or Wi-Fi; larger enterprise sites benefit from proprietary low-power mesh or LoRaWAN gateways for greater range and battery life.
Mount and power: install battery or wired sensors; many wireless sensors offer adhesive, bracket, or flush mounts.
Network onboarding: use a mobile app or management console to commission devices and assign them to zones.
Integration with building systems: connect via API, BACnet, or native integrations to lighting controls and BMS.
Testing and tuning: validate detection accuracy and adjust sensitivity or placement as needed.

Practical notes on maintenance

Monitor battery health via the management platform and plan staggered replacement cycles.
Use remote firmware updates to deploy security patches and feature enhancements.
Document sensor locations and zoning to simplify future troubleshooting and reconfiguration.

Comparing options — wireless thermal vs PIR vs camera

Wireless thermal sensors: Strengths: anonymous, accurate in low-motion scenarios, good for desk-level detection, lower privacy risk. Trade-offs: may have higher unit cost than simple PIR sensors but deliver greater operational ROI.
PIR sensors: Strengths: low cost, simple installation, effective for motion-driven spaces like corridors. Trade-offs: poor performance for stationary occupants; can cause false offs in low activity areas.
Camera-based systems: Strengths: rich analytics (headcounts, behavior), high resolution for occupancy patterns. Trade-offs: privacy concerns, higher data and storage requirements, complex compliance and maintenance.

Choose thermal when privacy, desk-level accuracy, and scalable analytics are priorities. Choose PIR for very low-cost motion detection needs. Choose cameras only when visual analytics justify the privacy and operational costs.

ROI & energy savings — simple illustration

A conservative ROI model compares incremental cost versus energy and operational savings.

Savings drivers: reduced lighting run-time, optimized HVAC schedules, lower maintenance, and improved space utilization.
Example (illustrative): a mid-size office replaces motion-only controls with thermal wireless sensors and reduces average lighting and HVAC runtime by 20–30%. The energy savings alone can often pay back sensor and installation costs within 12–36 months, with additional value from improved space scheduling and lower occupant complaints.

For accurate ROI, calculate local electricity and HVAC costs, install density, and projected runtime reduction. Many vendors provide calculators or case studies to model site-specific payback.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between wireless thermal and PIR occupancy sensors? - Thermal sensors detect heat signatures and work well for seated, low-motion occupants. PIR sensors detect motion changes and are best suited for movement-heavy areas.
Are thermal sensors anonymous and privacy-compliant? - Yes. Thermal sensors capture heat patterns, not images, making them suitable for privacy-sensitive environments and easier to align with privacy regulations.
How long do batteries last and how is maintenance handled? - Battery life varies by model and polling interval; many enterprise thermal sensors offer multi-year battery lifetimes. Management platforms provide battery monitoring and alerts to plan replacements.
Can these sensors integrate with lighting controls and BMS? - Most modern wireless occupancy sensors provide APIs and common protocols (BACnet, Modbus, or direct integrations) so they can trigger lighting scenes, HVAC setpoints, and feed analytics platforms.
How accurate are thermal sensors for desk-level occupancy? - Thermal sensors are generally more accurate than PIR for detecting stationary occupants at desks or in meetings. Placement and sensor field-of-view influence final accuracy.

Get a demo / Request pricing

If privacy-first, accurate occupancy detection and scalable analytics are priorities for your building, request a demo to see thermal wireless sensors in action. A demo will show detection performance, integration options, and an estimated ROI for your specific site.

Request a demo to evaluate detection accuracy in your spaces.
Download product specifications to compare sensor models and mounting options.
Contact a sales or solutions consultant to run a site-specific ROI and deployment plan.

Wireless occupancy sensors are a strategic element of smart building initiatives. Choosing heat-based, anonymous sensing provides a strong balance of privacy, accuracy, and operational savings - especially in office, education, healthcare, and retail environments where occupants spend long periods stationary.