Sensors Lab Validation for Butlr Thermal Sensors

Meet Butlr

Discover what spatial intelligence can do for you.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Why lab validation matters

Lab validation converts product claims into repeatable, measurable performance. For facility managers, researchers, and procurement teams, lab results demonstrate how anonymous, heat-based sensors behave under controlled conditions—before they are deployed in complex real-world spaces.

Butlr focuses on privacy-first, thermal occupancy sensing. Lab validation for these sensors shows how well the devices detect presence, estimate occupancy counts, and maintain accuracy when faced with variations in temperature, occlusion, and installation geometry.

Lab test setup — reproducible and controlled

A robust lab test setup isolates variables and ensures results are comparable across sensor models and test runs. Typical setup elements include:

Dedicated test space with controllable ambient conditions (temperature, airflow, lighting).
Mounting fixtures that replicate real installations: ceiling, wall, and recessed mounts at standard heights.
Ground truth systems for verification: non-invasive reference sensors, synchronized event logs, and anonymized video or pressure-mat data used only for validation.
Data capture infrastructure: high-precision clocks for synchronization, redundant logging, and access to raw thermal streams where permitted.

Sensors and mounting

Sensors are evaluated in both wired and wireless configurations. Mounting variations test field conditions such as:

Ceiling heights from low (8–10 ft) to high (15+ ft).
Off-axis angles to simulate non-central installations.
Proximity to heat sources (vents, windows) to assess robustness.

Controlled environment considerations

To stress-test sensor behavior, labs use controlled perturbations:

Ambient temperature sweeps to confirm stability across a defined operating range.
Airflow and HVAC cycling to evaluate transient responses.
Deliberate occlusions (partial and full) to measure falloff in detection confidence.

Data acquisition and synchronization

Accurate validation requires synchronized timestamps between Butlr sensors and ground truth. Labs use:

Centralized logging with precision time protocol.
Event markers for staged movements (entry/exit, seating/standing).
Repeatable scenario scripts to produce consistent datasets.

Measurement methodology — what we measure and why

Lab methodology converts raw sensor output into meaningful performance metrics. Core steps include:

Define scenarios and acceptance criteria before testing begins.
Calibrate sensors using stable reference points to ensure consistency.
Run repeated trials to quantify variance and confidence intervals.
Aggregate results into metrics aligned with real use-cases (e.g., conference rooms, open offices, corridors).

Scenarios tested

Common scenarios reflect typical building spaces and user behaviors:

Single-person detection: entry, seated, standing, and transient movement.
Multi-person occupancy: gradual fills, staged arrivals, and dense gatherings.
Edge cases: brief occlusions, objects with similar thermal signature, and environmental disturbances.

Calibration and ground truth

Calibration ensures sensor outputs map to known conditions. Labs commonly use:

Temperature references and blackbody targets for thermal sensors.
Synchronized ground truth from non-identifying systems (pressure mats, anonymized motion sensors) to avoid privacy violations.
Repeated baseline measurements to detect drift.

Metrics and acceptance criteria

Key metrics used to evaluate thermal occupancy sensors include:

Detection rate (sensitivity): ability to detect presence when someone is present.
False positive rate (specificity): spurious detections when the space is empty.
Occupancy estimation accuracy: consistency of count estimates in multi-person scenarios.
Latency: time from event (entry or movement) to detection/reporting.
Environmental robustness: performance across temperature and airflow variations.

Acceptance criteria vary by application. For a conference room solution, priority may be low false positives and quick detection on entry. For open-plan analytics, stable multi-person counts and resilience to occlusion are more important.

Typical results and practical insights

Lab validation produces actionable findings that inform installation, configuration, and product selection. Common insights include:

Line-of-sight and mounting matter: ceiling-mount configurations with clear coverage generally yield higher detection confidence. Offset or low mounts may reduce accuracy in dense scenes.
Occlusions impact confidence, not necessarily privacy: partial occlusions lower detection certainty; sensor placement and overlap can mitigate gaps.
Environmental dynamics affect thresholds: HVAC cycles and reflective surfaces create transient noise. Proper calibration and adaptive algorithms reduce false positives.
Aggregation improves counts: combining multiple, overlapping sensors with AI-driven fusion delivers more accurate occupancy estimates than single sensors in crowded spaces.

These insights translate into installation best practices: mounting recommendations, sensor overlap strategies, and tuning guidelines for thresholding and aggregation.

Reporting, reproducibility, and transparency

Butlrs lab reports typically include:

Test objectives and detailed setup documentation.
Scenario descriptions and step-by-step procedures to reproduce results.
Raw and aggregated metrics with confidence intervals.
Notes on environmental conditions and anomalies observed during runs.

Providing reproducible methods allows facility teams and researchers to validate claims in their own environments or compare Butlr results with other technologies.

Partner with us — research collaborations and demo units

Butlr supports research and procurement workflows with options tailored to labs and institutions:

Access to lab validation reports and whitepapers that detail methodology and findings.
Short-term loan programs and demo units for controlled testing in partner facilities.
Joint research projects to explore custom scenarios, academic studies, or standardization efforts.
Technical support for mounting, calibration, and data synchronization during partner tests.

If you manage a lab or research program, consider requesting test units or proposing a collaboration to validate specific use-cases in your environment.

Practical checklist for labs planning validation

Define application-driven acceptance criteria before testing begins.
Recreate expected field installations (mounting height and angle).
Establish non-invasive ground truth systems that respect privacy.
Run repeated trials across environmental conditions and use-case scenarios.
Document procedures and publish data summaries for transparency.

FAQs

Q: How are Butlr sensors tested in the lab?

A: Sensors are tested in controlled environments that replicate real-world conditions. Tests include staged occupancy scenarios, ambient temperature sweeps, occlusion trials, and synchronized ground truth collection. Procedures emphasize repeatability and privacy-preserving validation.

Q: What metrics does a lab report include?

A: Lab reports typically cover detection rate, false positive rate, occupancy estimation accuracy, latency, and environmental robustness. Reports also include test setup, scenario descriptions, and confidence intervals.

Q: Can we get demo units for research?

A: Butlr offers demo and loan programs for qualified research and evaluation projects. These programs include technical support for installation and data collection to ensure reproducible results.

Q: Are lab results representative of field performance?

A: Lab tests isolate variables to measure baseline performance. Field deployments add complexity—furniture, human behavior, and building systems—so lab results are a reliable baseline but should be complemented with pilot deployments for final validation.

Q: How is privacy handled during validation?

A: Butlrs thermal sensors are designed for anonymous, heat-based detection. Validation uses non-identifying ground truth systems and anonymized datasets to protect personal information while ensuring rigorous performance evaluation.

Next steps

Request lab reports or whitepapers tailored to your use-case.
Arrange demo units for controlled validation in your facility.
Propose a research collaboration to test specialized scenarios or publish joint findings.

Lab validation bridges product development and real-world deployment. By following rigorous, transparent methodologies, teams can choose sensing solutions with confidence and deploy them effectively across buildings and research environments.

Sensors Lab Validation: How Butlr Thermal Sensors Are Tested