
Meet Butlr
Discover what spatial intelligence can do for you.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Why build DIY sensors for your home lab?
This section explains motivations for building DIY sensors, from cost savings to privacy and customization.
- Cost: Individual modules are inexpensive compared with commercial multi-sensors.
- Learning: Hands-on experience with electronics, networking, and telemetry stacks.
- Customization: Control polling rates, reporting formats, and physical form factors.
- Local control and privacy: Keep data on-premises and integrate tightly with local automation systems.
Common sensor types & recommended modules
Summary of common sensor goals and recommended hobbyist modules. Accuracy, power, and ease of use vary by part.
Temperature
- DS18B20: waterproof probe option, easy digital readout, good for spot temperature readings.
- BMP series: pressure and temperature, useful for barometric pressure and altitude data.
Temperature + Humidity
- DHT22 (AM2302): very low cost, acceptable for non-critical monitoring but limited accuracy and long-term drift.
- BME280: temperature, humidity, pressure; more accurate and stable than DHT series.
CO2 / Air Quality
- Sensirion SCD4x family (SCD40, SCD41): high-quality CO2 readings for indoor air-quality monitoring; more reliable than low-cost NDIR knock-offs.
- Note: VOC sensors and CO2 measure different phenomena; choose CO2 when occupancy or ventilation measurement is the goal.
Motion / Occupancy
- PIR sensors: low-cost, reliable for motion-triggered automations and alarms.
- Thermal (heat-based) sensors: detect presence without identifying people; useful for privacy-sensitive occupancy analytics.
- For building-scale, anonymous heat-based sensing consider enterprise options like Butlr.
Pros and cons
- Accuracy: Sensirion and BME sensors are more accurate; DHT and cheap CO2 clones are less predictable.
- Cost: PIR and DS18B20 are very cheap; Sensirion and BME are mid-range.
- Power: Digital I2C sensors are efficient; Wi-Fi uplinks dominate battery drain.
- Privacy: Cameras identify people; heat-based and CO2 sensors are more privacy-preserving.
Typical hardware platforms
Common platforms for sensor nodes and gateways, with tradeoffs to consider.
ESP32 / ESP8266
- Pros: Low cost, built-in Wi-Fi, deep-sleep options for battery-powered sensors; good for small sensor nodes.
- Cons: Limited peripheral ports compared with a Pi; not ideal for heavy local processing.
Raspberry Pi
- Pros: Full Linux stack, easy to run gateways, local databases, or Graylog/ELK collectors; good when you need local automation and storage.
- Cons: Higher power draw, bulkier, more expensive for distributed sensors.
Design notes
- Power and battery life hinge on wireless radios; use deep-sleep and long publish intervals for battery nodes.
- Choose enclosures rated for your environment; ventilated housings help accurate temperature and humidity readings.