
Meet Butlr
Discover what spatial intelligence can do for you.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
What are workplace utilisation data sensors?
Workplace utilisation data sensors are devices or systems that detect and report how spaces are used. “Utilisation” refers to metrics like occupancy (how many people are present), dwell time (how long they stay), and peak density (crowding at specific times). Sensors provide the raw signals that analytics platforms turn into actionable insights for operations, real estate, and facilities teams.
Key sensor categories covered here
- Thermal sensors: detect heat signatures without producing images of faces.
- Motion sensors (PIR): register movement via infrared changes.
- Video cameras: visually detect and sometimes identify people.
- Wi‑Fi / Bluetooth analytics: infer presence from device signals.
- Badge / access logs: capture entries/exits tied to credentials.
- CO2 and environmental: infer occupancy indirectly from air quality.
Define terms
- Edge processing: analyzing sensor data locally on the device or gateway before sending aggregated results offsite.
- Anonymization: removing or obscuring personally identifiable information (PII) so individuals cannot be identified from the data.
Why privacy-first matters in 2026
By 2026, regulatory landscapes and employee expectations make privacy a strategic priority:
- Compliance: Laws like GDPR and CCPA require data minimisation and lawful bases for processing.
- Trust: Employees prefer transparent, non-identifying sensing that doesn’t feel like surveillance.
- Adoption: Privacy-first approaches increase buy-in for space optimization programs.
- Ethics: Respecting anonymity prevents misuse and reduces bias in operational decisions.
Privacy-first does not mean sacrificing accuracy. Modern camera-free and edge-processing sensors can deliver robust occupancy and flow metrics while keeping individual identities private.
Sensor types: pros, cons, and privacy implications
Below are the common sensor options and how they stack up for office optimisation.
- Thermal (camera-free)
- Pros: Accurate occupancy counts, works in low light, inherently anonymous, resistant to identification.
- Cons: May require calibration for very dense crowds; can be more expensive than simple PIR sensors.
- Privacy: High — produces no video and focuses on heat signatures rather than facial features.
- Video cameras with analytics
- Pros: High granularity and contextual understanding (e.g., posture, groupings).
- Cons: Privacy concerns, regulatory scrutiny, higher storage and management requirements.
- Privacy: Low to medium — depends on processing (on-edge anonymization vs. storing footage).
- Passive infrared (PIR) motion sensors
- Pros: Low cost, low power, good for simple motion detection.
- Cons: Cannot count individuals or measure dwell time reliably in multi-person settings.
- Privacy: High — no identifying data, but limited utility for precise utilisation metrics.
- Wi‑Fi / Bluetooth analytics
- Pros: Useful in legacy settings using device probes, can cover large areas.
- Cons: Many devices randomize MAC addresses; accuracy varies; depends on employees carrying devices.
- Privacy: Low to medium — can identify devices unless anonymized, and linkage to individuals may occur.
- Badge and access logs
- Pros: Reliable entry/exit events, useful for desk booking correlation.
- Cons: Only tracks access points, misses movement inside space unless combined with other sensors.
- Privacy: Medium — directly linked to identity unless pseudonymized.
- CO2 / environmental sensors
- Pros: Indirect measure of occupancy for ventilation control.
- Cons: Low spatial granularity; influenced by ventilation and room volume.
- Privacy: High — does not identify people but not a direct occupancy sensor.