
Meet Butlr
Discover what spatial intelligence can do for you.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Why sensor choice matters
Temperature measurements are central to reproducible experiments, product stability, and regulatory compliance. The right sensor improves data quality, shortens validation time, and reduces risk from out-of-spec conditions. Choosing a sensor means balancing accuracy, response time, durability, and how the probe interfaces with your workflow.
Types of lab temperature sensors
Different technologies and probe shapes suit different tasks. Brief definitions are provided for jargon the first time it appears.
RTD (Resistance Temperature Detector)
- Accuracy: typically high, stable over time.
- Best for: calibration labs, pharma validation, incubators.
- Notes: robust linear response, often used where ±0.1°C or better is required.
Thermistor
- Accuracy: very sensitive over a limited range.
- Best for: rapid-response measurements in liquids and small volumes.
- Notes: less linear across wide ranges; often lower cost.
Thermocouple
- Accuracy: wide temperature range, faster response for extremes.
- Best for: high- and low-temperature applications, furnaces, cryogenics.
- Notes: requires cold-junction compensation; lower absolute accuracy than RTDs in mid-range.
Rigid probes (stainless steel, immersion)
- Best for: liquid sampling, bath thermometry, long-term installation.
- Notes: durable, easy to disinfect, can withstand autoclaving if rated.
Flexible probes (cable-mounted, small-diameter)
- Best for: small vessels, microplate work, hard-to-reach spots.
- Notes: bendable tip, good for transient or contact measurements.
Wireless temperature data loggers
- Best for: distributed monitoring, cold chain, facility-level alerts.
- Notes: simplify data collection but require battery management and network planning.
Portable/pocket probes
- Best for: spot checks, field work, quick verification.
- Notes: highly portable, often plug into handheld meters or Bluetooth devices.
Wired vs wireless data loggers: pros and cons
Evaluate based on scale, environment, and validation needs.
Wired (direct-connect) systems
- Pros: reliable continuous data, simple power requirements, often easier to validate for regulated workflows.
- Cons: limited mobility, installation may be invasive in some setups.
Wireless systems
- Pros: easy deployment, flexible placement, remote monitoring and alerts.
- Cons: battery maintenance, possible data security/network concerns, may need additional validation steps for continuous recording.
Choose wired when strict traceability and uninterrupted power are essential. Choose wireless for facility-wide visibility, temporary studies, or hard-to-wire locations.