
Meet Butlr
Discover what spatial intelligence can do for you.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Which sensor type is right for your lab?
Three sensor technologies are common in labs: RTD, thermistor, and thermocouple. Each has strengths and trade-offs depending on accuracy needs, temperature range, and the sample or system being measured.
RTD (Resistance Temperature Detector)
- How it works: measures resistance change in a metal, typically platinum.
 - Strengths: high accuracy and stability, excellent for precision monitoring and regulatory environments.
 - Typical use-cases: incubators, cold-chain storage, process monitoring where long-term stability matters.
 - Considerations: higher cost than thermistors and moderate response time.
 
Thermistor
- How it works: semiconductor device with resistance that varies with temperature.
 - Strengths: very high sensitivity in narrow temperature ranges and low cost.
 - Typical use-cases: benchtop assays, environmental chambers, local temperature checks.
 - Considerations: non-linear response over wide ranges; requires careful calibration for high accuracy.
 
Thermocouple
- How it works: voltage generated at the junction of two dissimilar metals proportional to temperature.
 - Strengths: very wide temperature range and fast response time.
 - Typical use-cases: process ovens, temperature extremes, and rapid-change environments.
 - Considerations: lower absolute accuracy than RTDs and requires cold-junction compensation.
 
Choosing the right sensor starts with accuracy and range requirements, then considers response time, chemical compatibility, and total cost of ownership.
Key specs to compare
When evaluating lab temperature sensors, focus on specifications that ensure the device fits your application and regulatory needs.
- Temperature range: ensure coverage of the full extremes expected in your process or storage.
 - Accuracy and uncertainty: look for stated accuracy and measurement uncertainty across the operating range.
 - Resolution and repeatability: high resolution helps detect small changes; repeatability is critical for trend analysis.
 - Response time: important for dynamic systems, usually expressed as time to reach a percentage of the final value.
 - Sensor material and probe construction: stainless steel, glass-coated, or specialized sheaths for corrosive or sterile environments.
 - Probe tip geometry: fine tips for small volumes, immersion probes for liquids, surface probes for plates and trays.
 - Calibration traceability: certificates tied to national standards such as NIST are essential for regulated labs.
 - Environmental ratings: IP rating and resistance to temperature cycling or humidity.
 
Wireless data logging & validation for regulated environments
Wireless sensors and data loggers simplify monitoring large areas and multiple zones. For regulated industries, wireless solutions must support validation and traceability.
Data integrity and audit trails
- Ensure tamper-evident logs, time-stamped records, and secure storage for long-term retention.
 - Automatic alerts for excursions and configurable notification thresholds reduce risk.
 
Validation and compliance
- Systems should support GxP and FDA 21 CFR Part 11 where applicable and align with internal SOPs around electronic records and signatures.
 - Supplier-provided validation documentation such as IQ/OQ/PQ speeds qualification and audit readiness.
 
Connectivity and architecture
- Choose networks (Wi-Fi, LoRaWAN, proprietary mesh) based on facility layout, range, and interference.
 - Plan for redundancy and local buffering to prevent data loss during outages.
 
Integration with LIMS and building systems
- APIs and data export formats (CSV, secure database feeds) enable consolidation into LIMS and environmental monitoring platforms.
 
When evaluating wireless options, request sample datasets, validation guides, and evidence of secure firmware update processes.